※ 引述《Pash97143 (四叶天下第一)》之铭言：
: https://twitter.com/ShamsCharania/status/1624813135164239872
: The San Antonio Spurs are releasing forward Stanley Johnson, sources tell @
: TheAthletic @Stadium. Johnson had a strong stint for the Spurs this season,
: shooting 45 percent from 3-point range, and will now look to join a postseason
: contender.
: 心得: 哭啊
https://twitter.com/EricPincus/status/1624823785336590337
Here's the direct CBA language:
"If a Team trades a player and the assignee Team subsequently places the
player on waivers, the assignor Team shall not be permitted to sign the
player to a new Contract"
A waiver by a second trade, that's not the assignee Team
In the case of Stanley Johnson, he was traded from LAL to UTA, and the Jazz
as the assignee team waived him. Had they traded him to a third team that
then waived him, the 3rd team would not be the assignee team, circumventing
the restriction
So by that reading, the Lakers cannot sign Stanley Johnson. In a case like
this, if the Lakers had interest, they "should" call the league to verify.
Sometimes the NBA has a different interpretation than what seems logical by
the written word in the CBA
刚在BleacherReport记者Eric Pincus的推特，看到个满有趣的推文。
说照CBA的规定(Zydrunas Ilgauskas rule)，一支球队(转让人)把个球员，
交易到下家(受让人)后被裁，当初交易该球员的球队，不得在同一季把这球员签回。
尽管Stanley Johnson当初被湖人交易到爵士，然后被裁后马刺队捡走，但照上面
字意上的规定，湖人(转让人)和爵士(受让人)的情况都没改变。
并没有马刺签完Stanley Johnson又释出，让马刺变受让人。
湖人若真想把SJ签回，应该致电到NBA总部确认一下，有时候NBA官方对解释cba条文，
和其他人有所不同。
感想: 希望SJ还是有球队肯签他，加强板凳深度。