[外絮] 跳远买饭的判罚标准?NBA裁判在推特做出

楼主: mingonly (想要告诉你!)   2021-03-13 11:26:13
跳远买饭的判罚标准?NBA裁判在推特做出解释
(1/5) We’ve received lots of questions about these types of “pump and draw
” plays. The next series of tweets will explain the interpretation and how
these plays are adjudicated during games.
我们收到了很多关于假动作之后制造犯规的质疑,接下来的一系列推文我们将解释和展
示这些吹罚是怎么判出来的。
(2/5) First, let’s focus on the defender. Notice how Andrew leaves his feet
and is moving towards Luka. Any time a defender leaves his feet and jumps f
rom A to B TOWARDS a shooter, he is at risk of committing a foul. This type
of movement by a defender is illegal.


首先我们注意看防守的人(Wiggins),他的双脚离开了地面、跳向了Luka。任何时候,只
要是防守者的双脚离开地面、朝着投篮人从A点跳向B点,他就会处在犯规的危险之中,
这种动作对于防守的人来说是违规的。
(3/5) Now let’s take a look at what Luka does. While Luka does clearly jump
towards Andrew to ensure contact is made, it is not illegal for a shooter t
o jump directly towards the rim, as Luka is doing here.


现在让我们看看Luka做了什么,Luka明显跳向了Wiggins,以确保两人的碰撞能够发生。
投篮人朝着篮框的方向跳,是不违反规规的,就像Luka在这里做的那样。
(4/5) With Andrew in an ILLEGAL position, and Luka using a LEGAL basketball
move, when they make contact the onus is on the defender and the contact is
correctly deemed a defensive foul.


由于Wiggins处于一个非法的位置,而Luka使用了一个合法的篮球动作,当他们接触到对
方时,责任在防守者身上,这种接触被正确地视为防守犯规。
(5/5) Finally, Andrew getting a foot back to the floor does not absolve him
of his illegal movement. His momentum is still taking him forward when the c
ontact occurs, and this is still considered an illegal position by a defende
r.


最后,虽然Wiggins有收敛的动作,但是惯性仍然带着他向前,这依然被认定为防守人侵
占了空间。
https://twitter.com/OfficialNBARefs/status/1370460527550472192?s=19
作者: roger2623900 (whitecrow)   2021-03-13 12:01:00
所以是防守方往前跳就有事往上跳没事?
作者: tony09100920 (祐子)   2021-03-13 12:22:00
所以意思就是,只要防守者先扑防了,进攻者做多跨张的出手动作,甚至是往前鲤鱼跳,只要有接触,就是犯规
作者: daniellin435 (Daniel Lin)   2021-03-13 12:48:00
跳远联盟
作者: swingingbear (Bear~XD)   2021-03-13 20:13:00
kobe那个更过分好吗?很多站着不动还被吹的

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com