消息来源：https://goo.gl/7iBCZA
内容：
The NBA has a hard rule during altercations: Any players who leave the bench area receives a one-game suspension. Intent doesn’t matter.
It’s not negotiable. The league simply doesnt want more players entering a fracas.
Russell Westbrook found a gray area last night.
The Thunder star was waiting to check into Oklahoma City’s Game 4 loss to the Jazz when Raymond Felton fouled Rudy Gobert, um, unpleasantly.
Gobert and Felton got into it, though not immediately. Once they did, Westbrook walked onto the court, and he and Gobert swiped at each other.
Gobert and Felton eventually received technical fouls. But could harsher punishment be in store, especially for Westbrook?
Andy Larsen of KSL.com:
"A pool reporter request to the game officials to ask them about the play was initiated, but the NBA indicated that the officials wouldn't c
omment on the matter because it would be reviewed by the league’s disciplinary committee."
The key question should be: Did a referee already beckon Westbrook into the game? If one did, Westbrook shouldn’t be suspended. If none did,
Westbrook should be suspended. The league will talk to the refs and get a better understanding of what happened. Their account matters most.
But one indicator working against Westbrook: Steven Adams – whose toughness is beyond reproach – was also waiting to check in and stayed
on the sideline. If Adams had already entered the game, wouldn’t he have gotten involved? Maybe not, but his hanging back is circumstantial
evidence pointing toward a Westbrook suspension. Again, though, the referees’ accounts matter far more.
大意：
西河在第四战的时候疑似离开板凳区。 在Felton对Gobert犯规后，雷霆准备把他换上场但又还没真的上场。后来Gobert跟Felton冲突后，他冲上来加入战局
现在联盟正在调查，看到底西河在场上是不是裁判允许的。
补充：https://goo.gl/Mr5N8Y <- 判决已出 没被禁
短评或心得：好像太冲动了？