Engadget
http://www.engadget.com/2016/04/11/lg-g5-review/
得分：81
得分参考 (Galaxy S7:90 LG G4:87 )
优点：
Great performance
强大的效能
Dual-camera setup is fun, fascinating
双相机很有趣很吸引人
Modular design has potential
模组化设计很有发展潜力
缺点
The first add-on accessories aren't great
首先登场的扩充套件不算出色
Fit and finish doesn't impress
外观设计不够出众
Middling battery life
普普通通的续航
Pocketnow
http://pocketnow.com/2016/04/12/lg-g5-review
得分：8.0 (硬件:8.0 软件:8.0 使用者体验:8.0 )
得分参考 (Galaxy S7:9.5 LG G4:8.5)
优点
Modular makes a comeback
手机模组化重新登场
Amazing primary camera
惊人的主相机
Amazing wide-angle camera
惊人的广角相机
Outstanding performance
出众的效能
Futuristic design
充满未来感的设计
Replaceable everything
所有的人生必备它都有
LG Friends
LG与他愉快的好朋友们
Potential for more modules
后续更多扩充模组的潜力
缺点
Needs more polish in manufacturing the bottom slot
底部插槽在制造工艺上需要注意更多细节(例:http://i.imgur.com/tFqLk77.png)
Why are the chamfers so sharp?
为啥机壳的倒角部分感觉这么硌手
Microdized treatment feels like plastic
机壳的外观处理很有大塑料感
Aging concerns over paint finish
会让人担心涂装是否耐久
The display is dimmer than average
萤幕亮度设定不算好(这段讲起来有点复杂，我把原文打出来)
"but automatic settings favor darker settings,"自动亮度会偏低亮度设定
"requiring you to set it to around 70% brightness
just to match the level of the Galaxy S7" 需要调到70%才跟S7亮度差不多
Inconsistent battery life
续航表现不稳定
The Verge
http://www.theverge.com/2016/4/8/11391826/lg-g5-review-friend-modules-android
得分:7.7 (设计6,萤幕8,相机9,通话品质8,效能9,软件7,续航8,软件生态9)
参考得分 (Galaxy S7:8.8 LG G4:7.9)
优点
Move to metal construction is step in the right direction
朝向金属化机身设计是正确的方向
Flagship class display, performance, and camera
旗舰等级的萤幕，效能，还有相机
Dual-camera system has massive creative potential
双相机深具极大的发展潜力
Friends modules prove situationally useful
扩充模组在其对应的用途有它的效用
缺点
Plagued by lack of refinement
扩充模组不够精致
Saddled with carrier bloatware
担负了太多电信商预载软件
Overshadowed by better smartphone alternatives
在更强的旗舰机对手面前显得太影薄
Extra modules don’t add enough value yet
扩充模组的CP值不够
闲聊：看起来其实跟去年的评价蛮类似的 就是三家公认的相机很强
但是扩充模组带来了更多话题 最大的痛点可能还是在续航?