注:既然去年M9评价普遍惨就先挑过当作没这台吧
不然列了当沙包也没啥意思
Engadget
http://www.engadget.com/2016/04/14/htc-10-review/
得分：88
得分参考 (Galaxy S7:90 HTC One M8:87 iPhone 6S:91 )
优点：
Exceptional build quality
优秀的制造工艺品质
A more subtle approach to software than on previous HTC phones
软件比以往的hTC手机更加细腻
Top-tier performance
顶级效能
First Android phone that supports Airplay streaming out of the box
第一款支援AirPlay的安着手机
Great audio through headphones
耳机输出优良
缺点
Merely average battery life
续航只有平均水准
Camera performance falls short of some rivals
相机效能不如一些竞争对手
Sound is considerably less impressivewhen you listen through speakers
喇叭外放的能力并不让人惊艳
Hi-res earbuds aren't included with US models
美国版不送Hi-res earbuds
Pocketnow
http://pocketnow.com/2016/04/14/htc-10-review
得分：9.0 (硬件:10 软件:8 使用者体验:9 )
得分参考 (Galaxy S7:9.5 HTC One M8:8.7 iPhone 6S:8.9)
优点
Amazing design and build quality
惊艳的设计以及制造工艺
BoomSound re-imagined
重新定义了BoomSound
Great display
强大的萤幕
The best of Sense, the best of Stock Android
最好的Sense搭配最好的原生安桌
Above-average battery life
好于平均的续航能力
Quick-charge 3.0 in the box
内附QC3.0
Support for AirPlay out of the box
支援Air Play
IP53 water resistant
IP53防水防尘
缺点
Camera software needs tweaking
相机软件还需要改进
Launcher should adopt a better grid for QHD
这一句我不太确定该怎么完整的讲，原句是这样
大致上是针对桌面图示以及分辨率对应的问题
"HTC just needs to take a full step into taking advantage of Quad HD with a
denser grid for the icons on the home screen"
Why no Hi-Res headphones in the box in the US?
为啥美国版没有附高解析力的耳机(不然为啥美国卖比较便宜?)
A more competitive price would’ve helped
价格还需要更有竞争力(599美金还不够吗?)
The Verge
http://www.theverge.com/2016/4/14/11429858/htc-10-review
得分:8.0 (设计8,萤幕8,相机7,通话品质8,效能9,软件9,续航8,软件生态9)
参考得分 (Galaxy S7/S7edge 8.8/9.1 HTC One M8:8.5 iPhone 6:9.0)
Fast performance
飞快的效能
Reliable battery
可靠的续航
Great sound
强大的音效
Good software
良好的软件
缺点
Boring design
无聊的设计
Slow camera
相机速度慢?
High price
贵
闲聊:跟事前被许多人担心续航比起来，三家编辑对相机反而都比较有意见?