Re: [Bellator 110]Muhammed Lawal vs Mikhail Zayats

楼主: teresamlin (sam)   2014-03-02 13:10:10
※ 引述《KakutougiFan (转变在不知不觉中发生)》之铭言:
: http://ppt.cc/CkBf
: ROUND 1
: SHERDOG SCORES
: Mike Whitman scores the round 10-9 Lawal
: TJ De Santis scores the round 10-9 Zayats
: Mike Fridley scores the round 10-9 Zayats
: ROUND 2
: SHERDOG SCORES
: Mike Whitman scores the round 10-9 Zayats
: TJ De Santis scores the round 10-9 Lawal
: Mike Fridley scores the round 10-9 Zayats
: ROUND 3
: SHERDOG SCORES
: Mike Whitman scores the round 10-9 Lawal (29-28 Lawal)
: TJ De Santis scores the round 10-9 Lawal (29-28 Lawal)
: Mike Fridley scores the round 10-9 Zayats (30-27 Zayats)
: THE OFFICIAL RESULT
: Muhammed “King Mo” Lawal Def. Mikhail Zayats Decision (Unanimous) R3 5:00
: [30-27, 30-27, 30-27]
请问为何这场是Unanimous Decision,不是有两位裁判给Lawal(29-28),
一位给Zayats(30-27),最后三个30-27的比分又是怎么来?有谁可以解释一下???
作者: KakutougiFan   2014-03-02 21:42:00
楼上讲得没错, 另外我内心觉得美国比赛很重角力优势给分并不认同, 第三回合king mo只不过个角力优势就拿到这回合, 我认为很不合理但现在UFC跟Bellator就是这样给分, 几场比赛为例: Davis判定胜Machida显示出角力优势高于打击, Ben Henderson判定胜Thomson显示打击优势高于巴柔优势

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com