师任堂剧迷之海内外观众的反应都大同小异！哈哈！
资料来源：
https://forums.soompi.com/en/topic/343734-current-drama-2017-saimdang-lights-d
iary- - - -lee-young-ae-song-seung-hun/
讨论韩剧 师任堂：光的日记 之留言版英文网站，摘录几则心得如下：
1、哈哈哈。我全家也是。我们如此希望有一点点徐智允和现代李谦的机会。但是看来并
非如此。叹息。
2丶对！他们告诉我，对于徐智允一家团圆（先生未死而返家）无感，而对于李谦和师任
堂的对手戏而大哭。
3丶我应该听你们的话对于海外版有信心的，就不会对于看韩版26集而悲伤了。
4丶无论收视率或是政治僵局如何，我们应该对于我们观众自己有信心，这剧真地给我们
享受丶娱乐和我们在此留言区大量的讨论。
5丶这集结束，我对于此剧的爱并不因收视率表现而增加或减少，而是此剧如何吸引我及
引我入戏。李英爱在本片开始播出的访谈影片之一中，曾提到这片若有感动到一些观众，
就比收视率更有意义了。
6丶国际面上的好消息：Youtube印尼字幕版的师任堂浏览量，约每集15万次，马来西亚字
幕版师任堂韩版27集-海外版28集的影片张贴后几小时内，有3000多浏覧量。根据google
分析，我部落格张贴师任堂的网页已达到9350浏覧网页量，过去七天有1288，大部分访客
来自新加坡丶美国和澳洲。 所以别在意韩国收视率的差劲表现，在亚洲丶美国丶澳洲，
韩剧师任堂是受欢迎的！
（我自行注解：当然是就海外当地少数的平常在收看韩剧观众基础而言）
7丶时间穿越的科普解说，请自行去网页看英文...
Hahaha. My whole household too. We are so hoping for the slightest chance of S
JY and the modern Lee Gyeom. But it doesn't look that way now. Sigh.
Exactly! They told me that didn't have any emotion about the reunion and they
cried so hard about LG and SID's scenes :D
Posted 21 hours ago
On 2017/4/28 at 10:22 AM, liddi said:
I really should have listened to you and your faith in the international, shou
ldn't I, and saved myself some grief after SBS' Ep26
On 2017/4/28 at 11:15 AM, gerrytan8063 said:
No matter whatever the ratings were or the influences of political stalemate w
as at play......we will have to trust with our own viewership that this drama
indeed did provide us with enjoyment & entertainment & the comprehensive discu
ssion we had on the thread
At the end of the day, my love for the drama is not diminished or augmented b
y ratings... but rather how it appeals to me and draws me in
“More Meaningful Than The Ratings” - This Is What Lee Young Ae wishes For “
Saimdang” (Part 7/7)
Some good news on the international front:
(1) If you search YouTube (Khanzaa Clariss channel) for the Indo subbed episod
es of SLD, you'll see that the drama averages more than 150,000 views per epis
ode.
The Malay subbed video of Ep. 28 (SBS Ep 27) gained more than 3,000 views in j
ust several hours after the video was posted.
(2) According to Google Analytics, my Blogger blog post on SLD has now reached
more than 9.350 page views. For the past seven days, the blog post has had 1,
288 page views. Most of the visitors have come from Singapore and the USA, wit
h Australia coming in 3rd.
So never mind the poor Korean ratings. SLD is popular in Asia, Australia, and
the USA.
Posted 14 hours ago
On 2017/4/30 at 0:42 AM, liddi said:
Looking at what we know so far, the lines between past and present are blurred
, and it appears that two elements are at play here. The first is the time par
adox in the form of a causal loop - a future event being a cause of a past eve
nt, which in turn is the cause of that future event. Take for example SJY's di
scovery of the John Donne poem, which she copies and realises to be her penman
ship. Then in the time warp, she gives, not the original, but the copy to Saim
dang, who would in turn give it to Gyeom alongside the Soojinbang Diary, to be
brought to Italy, and discovered by SJY in the future.
This reminds me of the concept in physics known as “arrow of time” or what N
obel Prize-winning physicist Stephen Hawking referred to as the “psychologica
l arrow of time.” Hawking asked, “Why can we remember the past but not the f
uture?”
According to Albert Einstein’s special theory of relativity, there’s no diff
erence between the past and the future.
(1) From “The Arrow of Time feat. Sean Carroll, physicist at California Insti
tute of Technology”
"There is no intrinsic difference between the past and the future in the laws
of physics."
(2) From ”Why Doesn't Time Flow Backwards? (Big Picture Ep. 1/5)”
"But there's no distinction between forwards and backwards in time. The past a
nd future are on equal footing as far as the microscopic laws of physics are c
oncerned."
(3) From “Arrow of time: New understanding of causality, free choice, and why
we remember the past but not the future”:
The idea that our choices at present can influence events in the future but no
t in the past is reflected in the rules of standard quantum theory as a princi
ple that quantum theorists call "causality."
(4) From “Why does time pass?” (The Economist)
“The equations of physics suggest time should be able to go backwards as well
as forwards. Experience suggests, though, that it cannot. Why? And is time tr
avel really possible?”
At the 7:57 mark, Dr. Sean Caroll, physicist at California Institute of Techno
logy, discusses if time travel is possible.