: 炽炎战斧
:
: 我们曾考量把炽炎战斧的攻击力降至 2 点。这看起来相当单纯，不过尚未习惯此更动的
: 玩家可能会下意识地攻击 3 点生命的手下，然后惊觉自己并未解决掉目标。提升法力水
: 晶消费不但可以避免这种状况发生，也达到兼顾平衡性的诉求。
因为这段说明实在是太幽默了，想说是不是BB自己写的就去查了原文
结果发现差有点多R：
The other option we considered for Fiery War Axe was to lower its attack to
2, but that change didn’t feel intuitive enough. Generally, changing the
mana cost of a card is less disruptive, because you can always see the mana
cost of cards in your hand. Despite the increased mana cost of Fiery War Axe,
we expect that it will still see play—other 3 mana 3/2 weapons, like
Eaglehorn Bow, can be found in decks that may not have synergy with the weapon
’s card text.
https://us.battle.net/hearthstone/en/blog/21029448/
大概意思是改2攻不够直观 基本上改消耗对玩家的干扰比较少
因为你总是可以看到手牌消耗的水晶
尽管小斧变三费 但我们觉得应该还是会有人用
像其他3/3/2 好比鹰角弓 即使没跟秘密搭 也会被放进牌组中
.... 有没有干话型翻译的八卦？