https://bit.ly/40bVnW2
这次是有人投诉他们向伦敦大学询问1980年代的LSE毕业生口试资料由谁保存。
并且附上一则WDTK的询问连结。
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/does_the_university_of_london_ho#incoming%201940596
（总之就是抱苏西回答的浮木）
然后被伦敦大学以无理取闹为由拒绝回应。
然后ICO就直接吐槽说这个资讯请求根本就是论文仔在问蔡英文学位。
然后又提到MySociety之前对于大量提问情况的报告。
并提到ICO已经看过相关口试文件确认学位没问题。
而且完全和ICO无从属的法院也做出同样判断的事实。
最后说伦敦大学有权依照资讯自由法14（1）的规范拒绝提问。
并且有提到专员对于伦敦大学试图回应大众资讯需求的努力很满意，但是并无法满足剩下
的少数人，而继续回应他们也只是浪费公众资源。
而且投诉人其实已经展现出他有能力取得伦敦大学之前的公开回应资讯。
因此专员认为这次的资讯请求无合理理由。认为这只是浪费公众资源，以及目的是抹黑
蔡总统。只是对于资讯自由法的滥用。
呈上所述，专员认为这次的请求属于无理取闹。
(vexatious)
下引原文：
16. Of particular relevance in the present case is that the complainant
specifically references an earlier request, for the same information, to
which the public authority had already responded. The Commissioner
therefore takes the view that this is a request without reasonable
foundation and that it has been submitted for the purposes of wasting
the public authority’s resources, as well as attempting to discredit
President Tsai. This is an abuse of the FOIA process.
17. The Commissioner is therefore satisfied that this request is vexatious.
重要的是18条，专员附注说：
Other matters
18. The Commissioner notes that, given that he has set out his position on
this matter on a number of occasions, he is likely to refuse to deal with
future complaints relating to President Tsai’s thesis.
鉴于专员已经处理过这个问题好几次了，
他未来可能考虑拒绝受理蔡英文总统论文相关的投诉。
笑死，完全可以感觉到ICO的无奈。
※ 每日发文数上限为5篇，自删与板主删除，同样计入额度 ※
※ 发文 内文请满40字 ※