Re: [新闻] 高端无用?他验抗体值“破6百”打脸战斗

楼主: Amewakahiko (天若日子)   2021-09-10 22:39:35
仔细翻了一下美国FDA给Abbott AdviseDx SARS-CoV-2 IgG II的仿单与EUA letter
https://www.fda.gov/media/146368/download
https://www.fda.gov/media/146371/download 有以下字句
Prescription Use only
The product is intended for use as an aid in identifying individuals with an
adaptive immune response to SARS-CoV-2, indicating recent or prior infection.
At this time, it is unknown for how long antibodies persist following infection
and if the presence of antibodies confers protective immunity.
Semi-quantitative results from your product should not be interpreted as an
indication or degree of immunity or protection from reinfection.
Samples should only be tested from individuals that are 15 days or more post
symptom onset.
医师开单使用
本产品的结果是拿来指示 最近的SARS-CoV-2病毒感染或先前有感染过
目前并不知道感染后抗体能持续多久,以及抗体是否代表了保护性免疫力
半定量的结果不应该被解释成免疫力或避免再次感染的保护力
只应该拿来检测有症状后15天或以后的人的检体
(另外,通篇找不到vaccine的字样)
作者: sumarai (Pawn)   2021-09-10 22:43:00
嗯,跟李医师说的差不多
作者: fuyu1112   2021-09-10 22:46:00
这是自费的可能没那么严格? 另外50应该只是阈值 报告也没有写多少才足够
作者: sdbb (帮我泡杯卡布奇诺)   2021-09-10 23:45:00
结果这篇这么少推?
作者: CavendishJr (花学姐最高)   2021-09-11 00:09:00
美国CDC是有建议民众打完疫苗不要测抗体,因为市面上抗体试剂有些测不出来
作者: sanwan (源源源)   2021-09-11 01:07:00
所以s的测也不准?听说是亚培最新的测试剂
作者: helba (网络贫民窟)   2021-09-11 10:58:00
https://i.imgur.com/9NoVL5t.jpg李建璋和你说的不一样喔

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com