很好
如果蔡政府能够根据这个判例
马上跟国际法庭申请冲之鸟岛礁判定 (或者给钱请邦交国帮个忙)
我很想看看美日会怎么解释
其实阿 有时候 就明白讲 只是欺负台湾这个弱小的国家就好
我还觉得比这些写的漏漏长的屁话好
※ 引述《saveme (hihi)》之铭言：
: 这一段很有趣,
: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_Vobbbee7gydVBWblV2aWJpMms/view
: Examining the historical record, the Tribunal noted that the Spratly Islands
: were historically used by small groups of fishermen from China,
: as well as other States, and that several Japanese fishing and guano mining
: enterprises were attempted in the 1920s and 1930s.
: The Tribunal concluded that temporary use of the features by fishermen
: did not amount to inhabitation by a stable community and that all of
: the historical economic activity had been extractive in nature.
: 我大致翻意一下,
: 1920~1930年代短暂的渔业活动和鸟粪采矿行为只能是临时性,
: 而非视为永久居住一个稳定的社会共同体.
: 这就是这些岛为什么会被认为岩礁的观点.