※ 引述《radi035 (阿富)》之铭言：
: ※ [本文转录自 Gossiping 看板 #1KTidqQW ]
: 作者: NomadShu (啾啾修) 看板: Gossiping
: 标题: [新闻] 葛特曼律师回函 “柯文哲从未参与器官令
: 时间: Thu Nov 27 14:51:29 2014
: 【大选】葛特曼律师回函 “柯文哲从未参与器官仲介”
: 苹果
: 2014/11/27 14:31
: 美国作家伊森葛特曼（Ethan Gutmann）八月出版《大屠杀》（The Slaughter）一书，
书
: 中提及无党籍台北市长候选人柯文哲曾到中国取得人体器官。柯文哲上月底严正驳斥，
要
: 求葛特曼三周内更正，否则提告；葛特曼委任律师本月初回函，“三周内针对来函做完
整
: 回复。”柯文哲办公室下午公布葛特曼律师回函，澄清柯文哲从未参与器官仲介。
: 柯文哲办公室律师团袁秀慧律师今日发出声明表示，昨天已经收到代表葛特曼的安世立
律
: 师事务所回函，回函中清楚地说明，葛特曼认为台湾媒体对待柯文哲医师及葛特曼是不
公
: 平的，柯医师的举止高尚，从来不曾执行器官仲介，也从来不曾透过中国器官市场进行
获
: 利，柯医师对于揭露目前仍在中国进行的医疗犯罪行为有重大、国际级的贡献，柯医师
的
: 行为是令人骄傲的。
: 以下为葛特曼律师回函中英文：
: 葛特曼律师回函中文翻译：
: 请谅解我们的回应时间，超过了您当初于十一月四号信中，我们所承诺的三周期限数日
。
: 我们对于柯医师的疑虑非常认真地看待，且我们已经详阅所有书中相关页面并检视当时
撰
: 写依据的面谈纪录与文件。
: 我们认为，在台湾媒体上全面性的误解与鲁莽的指控，是因为Gutmann书中的英文与相
关
: 页面被翻译成中文过后，因为语言与文化的差异所造成的理解问题。
: 我们相信所有的误解都会在中文版的The Slaughter中被澄清，其中会包含未收录在英
文
: 版中的序言，会直接回应柯文哲医师的疑虑。
: 为了让事情更明朗，我们必须要指出，对于书中225页的理解，完全没有英语语系的评
论
: 家，有着跟第一语言是华语的台湾读者有着相同解释。
: 在您给Gutmann先生的信件中，您对于255页的叙述“所有器官都是来自于法轮功”有特
别
: 的疑虑。
: 这本书有透过三位专业读者同侪审查，且经Prometheus冗长的内部编辑过程，不仅包含
文
: 字内容，更须检视作者的笔记、访谈的录音带以及电子沟通。
: 没有任何英语系的读者会将标题或是文字内容解读为，柯文哲可从类似私人“器官仲介
”
: 交易的形式取得法轮功器官，只会解读为柯文哲医师是被告知资讯的。
: 迄今没有任何英语系读者曾经将柯文哲医师解读为器官仲介者。
: 迄今也没有任何英语系读者相信，柯文哲医师曾试图自行购买器官或是以任何形式参与
营
: 利行为。相反地，多数读者赞扬柯医师对于调查的贡献。审查人员们均一致地如此回应
，
: 就像是观众们在华盛顿特区National Endowment for Democracy中举办的The Slaughte
r
: 书本发表会的反应一样。
: 我们相信语言、翻译以及在台北市市长选举中激昂的政治环境，会导致大家误会作者的
意
: 思并让事情变得更模糊。
: 然而我们将全力确保在中文版的The Slaughter会越准确越好。
: 总而言之，我们重申我们认为台湾媒体对于柯文哲医师以及Gutmann先生的对待是不公
平
: 的。Gutmann先生相信且我们认为他的书所阐述的是，柯文哲医师的举止高尚，柯文哲
医
: 师从来不曾执行器官仲介，他也从来不曾透过中国器官市场进行获利，且他对于揭露目
前
: 仍在中国进行的医疗犯罪行为有着重大国际级的贡献，柯文哲医师的行为是令人骄傲的
。
: 葛特曼律师英文回函：
: Re: Your Letter to Mr. Gutmann on October
: Please excuse us for having exceeded by a few days the three week time perio
d
: within which we had agreed to expand upon our earlier letter to you of Novem
be
: r 4.
: We take Dr. Ko’s concerns very seriously and we have reviewed the relevant
pa
: ges in his book together with our own records of interviews and notes on whi
ch
: those pages were based.
: We have concluded that the entire misunderstanding and the reckless accusati
on
: s which have appeared in the Taiwan media would appear to be based on langua
ge
: and cultural differences between the English in Mr. Gutmann’s book, on the
o
: ne hand, and the understanding of the relevant pages when the latter have be
en
: rendered into Chinese.
: We believe that all misunderstandings will be clarified in the Chinese editi
on
: of The Slaughter, which will contain a special preface not included in the
En
: glish edition. This preface will address Dr. Ko’s concerns directly.
: For greater clarity, we would like to point out that no English speaking rev
ie
: wer of the book has understood page 255 in the way it has apparently been un
de
: rstood in Taiwan by readers whose first language is Chinese.
: In your letter to Mr. Gutmann, you specifically mentioned the caption on pag
e
: 255 reading “All the Organs will come from Falun Gong” as a particular con
ce
: rn.
: This book was peer-reviewed by three expert readers and subjected to a lengt
hy
: internal editing process by Prometheus. This review included not only the t
ex
: t itself, but also the author’s notes, interview tapes, and electronic comm
un
: ications.
: No English-speaking reader has understood the caption or the text to mean an
yt
: hing other than that Dr. Ko was being given information, rather than making
a
: statement about the availability of Falun Gong organs in some sort of person
al
: “organ broker” deal.
: No English-speaking reader to date has understood for one moment that Dr. Ko
w
: as acting as an “organ broker”.
: No English-speaking reader to date believes that Dr. Ko was trying to purcha
se
: organs himself or was in any way involved in any sort of profit-making vent
ur
: e.
: On the contrary, most readers have praised Dr. Ko for his contribution to th
e
: investigation. Reviewers have responded similarly, as did the audience at th
e
: author’s book launch at the National Endowment for Democracy in Washington
DC
: .
: We believe that language, translation, and the heated environment of the pol
it
: ical campaign for the mayoral race in Taipei may be playing a role in miscon
st
: ruing the author’s intentions and clouding the issue.
: Nonetheless we are interested in ensuring that the Chinese edition of The Sl
au
: ghter is as accurate as possible.
: In conclusion, we reiterate that we think the Taiwan media has been unfair i
n
: its treatment of both Dr. Ko and Mr. Gutmann. Mr. Gutmann believes, and we t
hi
: nk his book demonstrates, that Dr. Ko has acted honourably, that he has neve
r
: been an organ broker, that he has never sought profit through China’s organ
m
: arketing, and that he has contributed significantly to the international eff
or
: t to expose the medical crimes which continue to be perpetrated in China.
: Yours Truly
: Clive Ansley
: http://m.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/politics/20141127/514089/
: 嗯，别让葛特曼不开心
: 未看先猜有人说 有解释跟没解释一样，都是屁
如果我是菜总干事
我会说 难道柯营他们不会窜改 信内容吗？
不会自导自演 自己寄信 自己回信吗？
不会收买他吗？
疑点从从
至少有说好三周就三周 没拖到选后
但还是请柯p出来自己说清楚