我看到很多人在问是不是媒体翻译错了
https://reurl.cc/yD45Eq
可以看一下这篇经济学人杂志写的
To end birthright citizenship, Trump misreads the constitution
https://imgur.com/uGdNNrb
https://imgur.com/hDTgwB0
Under Mr Trump’s order, from next month the federal government will refuse
to issue “documents recognising American citizenship” (presumably
passports) to newborns unless they have one parent who is either a citizen or
a permanent resident of the United States. The children of unauthorised
immigrants born in America would thus be excluded. But so too would those of
around 3m people living in America on exchange, work or student visas.
经济学人应该不会错 所以是包含交换学者, 工作签证, 学生签的子女都无法获得公民权
有人会问说这是否违反黄金德案跟十四修正案?
十四修正案Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject
to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States
说明只有受其管辖权约束者才得以享有出生公民权,
现在共和党也是以该项基本来挑战
十四修正案, 主张非法移民不受管辖权的约束
但其他签证就比较难说就看大法官如何解释
黄金案则是主张黄金德父母皆为合法居留身分(商人)
现在美国大法官多数为保守派, 所以结果也很难说
不知道有没有人还想讨论这方面的卦