备注请放最后面 违者新闻文章删除
1.媒体来源:
News abc
2.记者署名:
Eric Tlozek, Orly Halpern and Allyson Horn
3.完整新闻标题
Israeli forces accused of killing their own citizens under the 'Hannibal
Directive' during October 7 chaos
以色列军方被指控在10/7当天依命令杀害自己的市民
4.完整新闻内文:
"Hannibal at Erez, dispatch a Zik [attack drone]," came the command on
October 7.
Those words, reported by Israeli newspaper Haaretz in July, confirm what many
Israelis have feared since the Hamas attacks on October 7 in southern Israel.
在10月7日，有命令下达：“在Erez的Hannibal，派遣Zik [攻击无人机]。”
以色列报纸《哈亚雷兹》在7月报导了这些话，证实了许多以色列人自10月7日哈马斯袭击
南部以色列以来的恐惧。
Israeli forces have killed their own citizens.
Israeli authorities say more than 800 civilians and around 300 soldiers were
killed on October 7.
A number of Israeli hostages have since died in Gaza.
Israelis are still reeling from the horror and pain of the Hamas-led terror
attack, which was the bloodiest single day in Israel's history.
But the Israeli military is coming under increasing pressure to reveal just
how many of their own citizens were killed by Israeli soldiers, pilots and
police in the confusion of the Hamas attack on southern Israeli communities.
Survivors and relatives have been asking not just "what went wrong", but
whether the military invoked the controversial — and supposedly rescinded —
"Hannibal Directive".
以色列军队已经杀害了自己国家的公民。
以色列当局表示，10月7日共有超过800名平民和约300名士兵遇难。
随后，一些以色列人质在加萨地带也死于非命。
以色列人仍在承受哈马斯主导的恐怖袭击带来的恐惧和痛苦，这是以色列历史上最血腥的
一天。
但以色列军方正面临越来越大的压力，对于揭露在哈马斯袭击南部以色列社区的混乱中，
以国军人、飞行员和警察究竟造成了多少自己国公民的死亡。
幸存者和亲属不仅在询问“到底发生了什么错误”，还在质疑军方是否启用了有争议的—
—且应该已经取消的——“Hannibal命令”。
What is the Hannibal Directive?
The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said the directive was named at random by a
computer program, but Hannibal was the famous Carthaginian general who took
poison rather than be captured by the Romans.
The doctrine, written in 1986 in response to the kidnapping of Israeli
soldiers in Lebanon, gave permission for Israeli forces to fire on enemies
holding their comrades hostage — even at risk to those hostages.
Its authors said the directive did not allow captives to be killed, but
critics say that over time an interpretation spread through the military that
it was better to kill comrades than to allow their capture.
什么是Hannibal命令？
以色列国防军（IDF）表示，这项指令是由电脑随机命名的，但Hannibal是著名的迦太基
将军，他宁愿服毒自杀也不愿被罗马人俘虏。
这一指导方针于1986年制定，以回应在黎巴嫩以色列士兵被绑架的事件。它允许以色列军
队在敌人扣押其同袍的情况下开火，即使这可能危及人质的安全。
该命令的起草者表示，命令不允许杀害人质，但批评者指出，随着时间的推移，军队内部
出现了这样的解释，即宁可杀死自己的同袍，也不愿意让他们被俘。
"They interpreted it as if they are [meant] to intentionally, deliberately
kill the soldier in order to foil the attempted abduction, and that was
wrong," Israeli philosopher Asa Kasher, who wrote the IDF code of ethics,
told the ABC."That is legally wrong and morally wrong and ethically wrong,
it's wrong on all accounts."
以色列哲学家阿萨·卡舍（Asa Kasher），他曾编写过IDF的伦理守则，对ABC新闻说：“
他们将其解释为，应该在考虑后故意杀死士兵，以阻止绑架，这是错误的。这在法律上是
错误的，在道德上是错误的，从伦理上讲也是错误的，这在各方面都是错误的。”
After October 7, there were some testimonies from Israeli civilians and
military personnel that Israeli forces responding to the Hamas attack killed
their own citizens.
Nevertheless, many Israelis and supporters of Israel condemned anyone who
suggested it had occurred, before more testimonies and Israeli media reports
confirmed it was true.
The IDF has not confirmed or denied a version of the Hannibal directive was
applied on October 7, only saying it is one of many things from that day
under investigation.
In response to questions from the ABC, the Israeli military provided a
statement saying: "The IDF is currently focused on eliminating the threat
from the terrorist organisation Hamas."
"Questions of this kind will be looked into at a later stage."
在10月7日之后，一些以色列平民和军人证实，以色列军队在因应哈马斯袭击时，杀害了
自己的公民。
尽管如此，许多以色列人和以色列的支持者谴责了那些提出此事的人，直到更多证词和以
色列媒体报导证实了这一事实。
以色列国防军尚未确认或否认10月7日是否用了Hannibal命令，只表示那一天的许多事情
正在调查中。
对于ABC新闻的提问，以色列军方提供了一份声明，称：“IDF目前专注于消除恐怖组织哈
马斯的威胁。”
“这类问题将在后续阶段进行调查。”
'This was a mass Hannibal'
In July, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz revealed commanders in the IDF gave
the order to fire on troops who had been captured by Hamas at three separate
locations, explicitly referencing the Hannibal Directive.
One former Israeli officer, Air Force Colonel Nof Erez, told a Haaretz
podcast the directive was not specifically ordered but was "apparently
applied" by responding aircrews.
Panicked, operating without their normal command structure and unable to
coordinate with ground forces, they fired on vehicles returning to Gaza,
knowing they were likely carrying hostages.
"This was a mass Hannibal. It was tons and tons of openings in the fence, and
thousands of people in every type of vehicle, some with hostages and some
without," Colonel Erez said.
Air force pilots described to Yedioth Ahronot newspaper the firing of
"tremendous" amounts of ammunition on October 7 at people attempting to cross
the border between Gaza and Israel.
"Twenty-eight fighter helicopters shot over the course of the day all of the
ammunition in their bellies, in renewed runs to rearm. We are talking about
hundreds of 30-millimetre cannon mortars and Hellfire missiles," reporter
Yoav Zeitoun said.
"The frequency of fire at the thousands of terrorists was enormous at the
start, and only at a certain point did the pilots begin to slow their attacks
and carefully choose the targets."
Tank officers have also confirmed they applied their own interpretation of
the directive when firing on vehicles returning to Gaza, potentially with
Israelis on board.
"My gut feeling told me that they [soldiers from another tank] could be on
them," tank captain Bar Zonshein told Israel's Channel 13.
Captain Zonshein is asked: "So you might be killing them with that action?
They are your soldiers."
"Right," he replied, "but I decided that this is the right decision, that
it's better to stop the kidnapping, that they won't be taken."
Investigative journalist Ronen Bergman wrote for Yedioth Ahronot newspaper
that the military had enacted the Hannibal Directive at midnight on October 7.
"The IDF instructed all its fighting units in practice to follow the
'Hannibal Directive', although without clearly mentioning this explicit
name," he said.
"The instruction is to stop 'at all costs' any attempt by Hamas terrorists to
return to Gaza, using language very similar to the original 'Hannibal
Directive', despite repeated assurances by the security establishment that
the procedure has been cancelled."
Bergman's investigation found 70 vehicles were destroyed by Israeli aircraft
and tanks to prevent them being driven into Gaza, killing everyone inside.
"It is not clear at this point how many of the abductees were killed due to
the activation of this [Hannibal] order on October 7," he wrote.
The original Hannibal Directive, while confidential, reportedly recommends
small arms and sniper fire towards enemies holding hostages — and not to use
bombs, missiles or tank shells.
“这是一场大规模的Hannibal行动”
在7月，以色列报纸《哈亚雷兹》揭露，以色列国防军的指挥官下达了在三个不同地点对
被哈马斯俘获的部队开火的命令，明确提及了Hannibal命令。
一位前以色列军官、空军上校诺夫·埃雷兹（Nof Erez）告诉《哈亚雷兹》播客，该命令
并未被具体下达，但被回应的空中部队“明显使用”。
由于恐慌、在没有正常指挥结构的情况下操作，且无法与地面部队协调，他们在知道这些
车辆很可能运载着人质的情况下，向返回加萨的车辆开火。
“这是一场大规模的Hannibal行动。围栏上有大量漏洞，数以千计的人在各种车辆中，有
些载着人质，有些则没有”埃雷兹上校说。
空军飞行员向《以色列报》描述了10月7日向试图穿越加沙与以色列边界的人群发射“巨
量”弹药的情况。
记者Yoav Zeitoun说：“28架战斗直升机在一天之内射光了它们的所有弹药，不断进行补
给。我们说的是数百枚30毫米口径炮弹和地狱火导弹。”
“起初对数千名恐怖分子的开火频率非常高，只有在某一时间过后，飞行员才开始减少攻
击并仔细选择目标。”
坦克指挥官也确认，他们在向返回加萨对可能载有以色列人的车辆开火时使用了自己对命
令的解释。
坦克指挥官巴尔·宗希（Bar Zonshein）告诉以色列第13频道：“我的直觉告诉我，那
些 [来自另一辆坦克的士兵] 可能在他们身上。”
当被问到：“所以你有可能会在这个行动中杀死他们？他们是你的士兵。”时，宗希回答
：“对，但我确定这是正确的决定，阻止绑架会比较好，他们不会被俘。”
调查记者罗嫩·伯曼（Ronen Bergman）在《以色列报》上写道，军方在10月7日午夜启用
了Hannibal命令。
“IDF指示所有作战单位实际上遵循‘Hannibal命令’，虽然没有明确提及这个具体名称
，”他说。
“命令是‘不惜一切代价’阻止哈马斯恐怖分子返回加萨，使用的语气与原本的‘
Hannibal命令’非常相似，尽管安全部门一再保证该程序已被取消。”
伯曼的调查发现，以色列的飞机和坦克摧毁了70辆车辆，以防它们驶入加萨，杀死了车内
的所有人。
“目前尚不清楚有多少被掳人员是因为10月7日启用这个 [Hannibal] 命令而被杀害的，
”他写道。
原本的Hannibal命令虽然是机密的，但据报导建议对持有俘虏的敌人使用小型武器和狙击
火力，而不是使用炸弹、导弹或坦克炮弹。
5.完整新闻连结 (或短网址)不可用YAHOO、LINE、MSN等转载媒体:
https://reurl.cc/GppR0x
6.备注:
整件事情太过骇人听闻，所以我撷取部分内文出来供大家判断真伪，
news abc算大间的报社了，应该不至于凭空造谣。
很难想像这些军人是用什么心情在轰炸自己人，
似乎欧洲人的命对于国家来说也是可以舍弃的，
天下的贱民一般可怜，唉