其实吵这个没意义
不管几点发的，或是有没有网军
重点是这篇是发在伦敦大学网页
代表伦敦大学官方立场
所以重点在其内容
再重贴一次
University of London statement on missing thesis
Dr Tsai Ing-wen, who is now the President of Taiwan, was awarded a PhD in
February 1984 following the submission and examination of her thesis by two
examiners. While it remains unclear whether copies were deposited with the
University’s library, that has no bearing on Dr Tsai’s PhD, which was
correctly awarded.
The University categorically denies any allegations of wrongdoing or
falsehood made against any member of staff in relation to the search for
copies of this thesis. All University of London staff who have handled
enquiries related to this thesis have done so with the utmost integrity.
LSE has an electronic copy of the thesis available to access via their online
thesis system - LSE Theses Online(Opens in new window).
标题说的，missing thesis，指的是1983年那本蓝皮书
第一句说有口试，口委也有上交论文
第二句说不清楚副本有没有存放于图书馆，但不影响蔡英文的学位
接着第二段说的是伦大确认其职员在搜寻论文副本时没有任何不法或错误
但我不晓得第二段声明有没有包含伦大档案管理Suzie
因为Suzie 曾经搜寻过这本论文
并确认伦敦大学图书馆未曾收到论文(from examiner)
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/the_publication_date_of_tsai_ing#
明显和第一段的声明牴触
同样的结论其实在林环墙教授两年前的报告就有了
当时也是请伦敦大学图书馆员搜寻，一样的结论
最后一段说有电子版的论文
因为标题开宗明义就讲了论文遗失了
那2019年出现的电子版显然不能证明曾有这本蓝皮书的存在
最后，论文有没有存放于图书馆不影响学位
但是若是Suzie讲的"论文从未交到图书馆"
也不影响学位吗？
这才是伦敦大学应该回答的问题