Re: [爆卦] 伦敦大学未曾出版蔡英文博士论文

楼主: Borges (波波波波)   2022-01-17 15:13:26
: ※ 引述《art1 (人,原来不是人)》之铭言

英文是你自己找的
你自己要不要翻翻看中文?
看看以下三段34/35/36中
你说的“法官看过蔡总统口委签名文件”
的文字在哪里?
看不懂英文的话
你可以请教读得懂英文的人
不要再丢一些自己都看不懂的英文骗人了
感谢
: Evidence
: 34. We have read and taken account of an open and a small closed bundle of
: documents.
: 这一句叫做伦敦大学说有文件,所以驳回?
: 35. It is necessary that the documents in the closed bundle are not revealed
: to Mr Richardson because to do otherwise would defeat the purpose of the
: proceedings.
: The tribunal accepts that in accordance with the guidance given by the Court
: of Appeal in Browning we are required to disclose as much as possible about the
: closed bundle when writing our decision.
: 还是这一段叫做伦敦大学说有文件,所以驳回?
: 我引的段落则是下一段
: 36. In accordance with the guidance in Browning, the tribunal records that
: the closed bundle is limited to a document containing the requested information
: i.e. the names of the examiners and the date the examiners signed approval of
: the thesis.
: 伦敦大学上呈证据,法官判决书写 We read,你能解读成法官不看文件只听伦敦大学说

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com