推 yftsai: 现在LSE和伦大都否认有口试资料了 36.239.21.73 01/15 07:44
→ yftsai: 那法官看的那个口试资料是哪里来的颗颗 36.239.21.73 01/15 07:44
yftsai 就是属于不看法官驳回上诉判决书的众多论文仔之一啦 XDDDDDDDDDDD
推 yftsai: 还有伦敦大学之前说图书馆改建遗失了 36.239.21.73 01/15 07:49
→ yftsai: 现在怎么变成没收到过 36.239.21.73 01/15 07:49
因为追查到最后，发现没有口委把论文转交给图书馆的纪录吧
也可能是没纪录用推论的啦，M01 的 turtlins 在追查伦敦大学那些未收到的论文后也
做出同样的推论啦，因为只剩这种可能才会导致图书馆没有留下纪录啦 XDDDDDDDDDDDD
判决书也是写类似的内容
As explained above, it does appear from the evidence that copies of the thesis
may not have been provided to the libraries at the time by the examiners,
rather than having been lost or mis-shelved.
嘘 eulogy: 判决书哪里有写法官有看到口委签名 别造 220.129.216.46 01/15 08:57
→ eulogy: 谣好吗 220.129.216.46 01/15 08:57
两个法官驳回两次上诉，驳回理查森上诉的判决书就有写了啦 XDDDDDDDDDD
In accordance with the guidance in Browning, the tribunal records that the
closed bundle is limited to a document containing the requested information
i.e. the names of the examiners and the date the examiners signed approval of
the thesis.
论文仔就继续无视法官判决书啦，毕竟现实对你们来说太残酷了 XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
嘘 tontontonni: 造谣？ 39.8.134.191 01/15 08:58
→ tontontonni: 判决书哪里有写法官说有论文？ 39.8.134.191 01/15 08:59
都有口委签名文件了，还会没有论文？ XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
As explained above, it does appear from the evidence that copies of the thesis
may not have been provided to the libraries at the time by the examiners,
rather than having been lost or mis-shelved. However, this does not mean that
the University has provided inaccurate information about the fact that
President Tsai was awarded a PhD degree. There is also nothing to suggest that
the correct number of bound copies were not provided by President Tsai prior to
the viva examination.
顺带一提，判决书这边写的 correct number of bound copies 是两本啦，而不是论文
仔一再宣称的三个图书馆都要有，当年 LSE 图书馆不是收藏学生论文的地方啦 XDDDDD
嘘 DanceLove: 哇 特地回一篇反击，如果觉得论文仔们 114.45.24.78 01/15 09:11
→ DanceLove: 再搞，不用那么紧张吧 哈哈。而且学校 114.45.24.78 01/15 09:11
→ DanceLove: 没收到论文会让学生毕业，还能授予博士 114.45.24.78 01/15 09:11
→ DanceLove: 学位？那伦敦大学用什么当依据呢？ 114.45.24.78 01/15 09:11
校方认证的学位，只有论文仔才会觉得别人在紧张啦 XDDDDDDDDDDDDD
用口委签名文件当依据给学位有什么问题吗？ XDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
论文遗失明明就不是大事，只有论文仔才会搞了两年多还不愿面对事实啦 XDDDDDDDDDD
嘘 ramirez: 论文在转交环节消失了咧 证据在那？ 42.77.211.241 01/15 09:41
阿就查不到入馆纪录啊 XDDDDDDDDDDD
有口委签名文件就足以证明当年有论文了啦 XDDDDDDDDDDD
更别提 IALS 1985 年出版的论文目录也有记载蔡的论文题目啦 XDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
再不然论文仔有种去找孙玉文求证阿，看看孙玉文当年引用论文时看到的论文到底是整
本论文还是一页一页的原稿，不过论文仔心虚不敢去找孙玉文求证啦 XDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
嘘 naiveman: 你是本人吗？为什么你要护航？死忠的喔223.138.140.219 01/15 10:21
论文仔就继续不看判决书嘛 XDDDDDDDDDDDD
嘘 tontontonni: 所以论文消失了？你怎么知道？ 39.8.134.191 01/15 10:32
→ tontontonni: 谁托梦给你 39.8.134.191 01/15 10:32
论文仔就继续不信法官判决书写的内容阿 XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
嘘 aul4xu44: 判决书哪里有写有论文？ 塔绿班还在骗？ 218.172.159.37 01/15 11:05
法官都看过口委签名文件了还在没有论文 XDDDDDDDDD
嘘 annie06045: 又来了 你打高端了没 114.34.125.248 01/15 16:58
唸到硕博士还无法实事求是，可怜呐 XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD