最新判决懒人包
LSE正式否决伦敦大学所提供的口试委员,
并认为当时几乎不可能有那场口试
详见判决书第17点
https://i.imgur.com/Aq9m2lb.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/sDmEETS.jpg
17. The student record had been examined and no definitive record of the
examiners had been found. Whilst one document indicated that a particular
individual might have been an examiner, the LSE had no way of cross-checking
whether that individual had in fact performed that role – and the LSE
considered it unlikely that they would have done so.
17.我们已经详细检查了学生记录,
并没有找到任何关于口试委员的明确记录
虽然另外一份文件有提到"某人"可能是口试委员
但LSE校方由于无法交叉确认那人确实那时担任了口试委员这个角色
因此LSE校方认为这群人(蔡英文,口委等等)
当时几乎不可能(unlikely)举行了这场口试
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
每个人英文程度跟解读不同
以下提供一些小弟我"个人"对这次判决书的解读
LSE之前都是说自己只持有学籍资料
而论文相关资料(包含口委名单)都在伦敦大学那边
而这次最新判决中
LSE校方不再隐晦
而是直接否决了伦敦大学提供的口委名单
并且觉得当时几乎不可能有那场口试