内文恕删 虽然内文新闻没有一句
说武汉不是起源 但标题还是那样下
所以我去看了一下外媒
所有外媒标题都是
who否认covid-19来自于实验室
并没有说不是起源于武汉
所以三立这篇的标题是在误导
附1. wsj:Coronavirus Likely Came From Animal, Not Leaked From Laboratory, WHO Sa
ys
https://reurl.cc/l0Zgk6
2. bbc:Covid: WHO team says 'extremely unlikely' virus leaked from lab
https://reurl.cc/0D69zo
3.cnn:Coronavirus most likely came from animals, not a lab, world health officia
l says
https://reurl.cc/qmZrD3
4.skynews:COVID-19: WHO experts will leave China with three theories about the o
rigins of the virus
https://reurl.cc/ynmYgE
随便翻译其中一篇skynews的一段内容:
The World Health Organisation (WHO) came to Wuhan with four theories about the o
rigins of COVID-19.
who来到武汉，带着四种关于covid-19起源
的理论假设
They will leave China with three.
他们将带着其中三种离开中国
The four ideas were that it jumped directly from animals to humans, that it spre
ad via an intermediate host, that it was imported in from somewhere else, or tha
t it came from a laboratory.
这四种假设分别是:
直接由动物传给人类，
由动物通过某种中间宿主传给人类，
从某个（不是实验室的）地方传入，
从实验室传入
Out of those, only the lab leak has now been discounted as "extremely unlikely".
Further research into it will not be pursued - at least not by them.
在这些假设中，只有从实验室流出被认为
不可能，将来有关来自实验室的进一步研究
将不再进行，至少不会由who来执行。
所以who目前的结论是covid-19不是来源于
实验室，其他的可能性都存在。
※ 引述 《Axwell》 之铭言：
: 赴武汉“调查病毒源头” WHO公布结果：武汉不是起源