1.三公报是历史文件
2.美国果然很会留一手
原文：
https://goo.gl/HQp7HT
P13页
Q：你支持美舰泊台吗？支持台舰泊美吗？
如果是的话，请说明要如何符合美国长期的一中政策下来军舰泊港？
还有请说明泊港让台美有何实质的利益？
I have been on the record in published articles supporting both U.S. Navy
Ship visits to Taiwan,
as well as Taiwan navy ship visits to the United States.
Such port calls would be entirely
consistent with our One China Policy as we define it.
我已公开表示支持这个美舰泊台与台舰泊美的议题
这种泊港的方式将完全符合我们美国所定义下的一中政策
We already have occasional U.S. military flights land in Taiwan,
and have had Taiwan military aircraft land in the United States.
We have active duty members of the U.S. military permanently assigned to Taiwan.
我们美国的军机先前就偶而临停在台湾，台湾的军机也停在美国过
我们现役的美军长期派驻台湾
Since we reserve forourselves the right to define our own One China Policy,
commencing U.S. ship visits to Taiwan
and vice versa can be included.
The benefits of U.S. port calls to Taiwan would fall into the
traditional justification for port calls to any other friendly country in the
world – rest and
relaxation for the sailors (which aids in recruitment and retention);
minor repair and maintenance;
port familiarization to assist in planning for a known
contingency; and to support
o
ur political goals of supporting Taiwan and deterring China.
If there are alternate views in theDepartment of Defense,
I look forward to learning more about the counter arguments.