Re: [问卦]台湾法条跟法官判决书 不学美国一样白话?

楼主: cp109 (cp109)   2017-08-15 10:41:06
※ 引述《ptt888 (op)》之铭言:
: 即使是法律系学生,很多也看不懂法条规定 大法官解释跟法院判决书
: 更别说是一般人民
: 例如:“尚非难谓无吸食安非他命”,
: “迳认被告前开言论已使在场员警心生畏惧,委无可采”
: 自非无疑”、“即非无疑”、“使在场员警心生畏惧,委无可采”等词句,
: 法律条文跟法院判决,以及大法官解释对象都是人民,
: 你写的人民看不懂,是要人民怎么知法?
: 美国法条跟判决书,如果翻译成中文,连一般台湾人都看的懂
: 为什么台湾法条跟法官判决书,不学美国一样白话?
说这个太好笑
美国法院判决一堆 英文单字
你以为美国一般人就看得懂吗?
节录一段
Tort Law
A body of rights, obligations, and remedies that is applied by courts in
civil proceedings to provide relief for persons who have suffered harm from
the wrongful acts of others. The person who sustains injury or suffers
pecuniary damage as the result of tortious conduct is known as the plaintiff,
and the person who is responsible for inflicting the injury and incurs
liability for the damage is known as the defendant or tortfeasor.
Three elements must be established in every tort action. First, the plaintiff
must establish that the defendant was under a legal duty to act in a
particular fashion. Second, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant
breached this duty by failing to conform his or her behavior accordingly.
Third, the plaintiff must prove that he suffered injury or loss as a direct
result of the defendant's breach.
.....
The law of torts serves four objectives. First, it seeks to compensate
victims for injuries suffered by the culpable action or inaction of others.
Second, it seeks to shift the cost of such injuries to the person or persons
who are legally responsible for inflicting them.
Third, it seeks to discourage injurious, careless, and risky behavior in the
future. Fourth, it seeks to vindicate legal rights and interests that have been
compromised, diminished, or emasculated. In theory these objectives are served
when tort liability is imposed on tortfeasors for intentional wrongdoing,
Negligence, and ultrahazardous activities.
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Tort+Law
多益1000分的 敢说看得懂?
作者: Superxixai (洪粉吱已)   2017-08-15 10:42:00
法学英文先打死一票人
作者: gamania10000 (自助旅行中)   2017-08-15 10:42:00
把两集酸民的英文小教室看完有办法吗
作者: pinhanpaul (没风度到极点的病)   2017-08-15 10:43:00
让我们继续检讨中华台北法院的倒装句
作者: drigo   2017-08-15 10:54:00
最最最基本的侵权法定义

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com