Fw: [新闻] 杨泮池:开学术伦理课、引进软件图片判读

楼主: ACE520 (ASE)   2016-11-22 08:54:00
※ [本文转录自 AfterPhD 看板 #1OCgm4GP ]
作者: ACE520 (ASE) 看板: AfterPhD
标题: Re: [新闻] 杨泮池:开学术伦理课、引进软件图片判读
时间: Mon Nov 21 16:10:40 2016
给你参考一下,时任中山大学校长(现任科技部长)任内的两个案例
国外期刊专家都拿不到资料,原来有被质疑的论文可以不给原始raw data
供人检视调查
Lessons Learned : 高高举起,轻轻放下(舞弊不会出事)
First case:
Author : Meng-Che Wu
Assessment of Applying SSSC to Power Market for Carbon Trading
Link:
http://etd.lib.nsysu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search/view_etd?URN=etd-0626111-171029
https://imgur.com/a/70lJ2
Author: : Kai-Hung Lu
Assessment of Power Market for Carbon Trading by Modified Particle Swarm
Optimization
Link:
http://docdro.id/HavLohO
http://www.iaeng.org/publication/IMECS2012/IMECS2012_pp1047-1051.pdf
教育部调查两个月回复
有关您来信陈情国立中山大学电机系博士班吕姓学生于2012年发表之研讨会论文疑似违反
学术伦理情事乙案,
本部业转请国立中山大学查明,经该校依相关程序查复说明如下:
一、吕生目前就读该校电机系博士班,台端所陈内容与其博士论文无涉。
二、大学非属营利组织,其研究计画成果可做为毕业论文,亦可用来投稿成会议论文,
或再精进投稿为期刊论文,之间并无冲突;该领域电力界最顶尖IEEE期刊,论文需于
会议先发表,才能进入期刊挑选,会议及期刊论文完全相同,近期才分开,此系论文发表相关期程
与“国立中山大学在学学生学术伦理规范暨违反学术伦理案件处理要点”第2条第5项
规定无涉。
三、研究生参与研究计画之研究成果,其成果列名与否有其惯例,如大型或跨领域计画成
员规模较大,
依惯例会以教授列名,非民众所述二人以上之共同研究成果据为己有,
而大型计画虽然基本上著作权共有,但计画成果仍可由教授依其权责使用,
其列名、应用及得否使用于毕业论文仍属主持教授之裁量权。
四、违反学术伦理案件之判定应严谨慎重,台端之陈情,该校已妥慎检讨,
该生指导教授亦再度陈明无违反学术伦理之情事,特此说明。
敬祝健康快乐教育部敬复
IMECS回复
Dear Sir/Madam,
After investigating this case with view points from both parties, it seems
to us that this is an internal case of how to split the work credits among
the team members of the same laboratory. As it seems that this is an
internal affair involving one single laboratory, it would be better if you
can direct your complaint to the head of the laboratory directly. Of if one
would like, one may send the complaint to the head of the department
supervising that laboratory. This is because only the head may keep the
records of the individual works/contributions of each team member of the
laboratory. After their official decision, we are more than happy to follow
their decision.
We are looking forward to your understanding because we do not have the
legal power to order laboratory to hand internal personal data to us before
of privacy issues concerned.
Should you have any enquiry, please feel free to contact us.
Best regards,
Anna Lee
Assistant Secretary
International Association of Engineers (IAENG)
Second case:
1.Author:李元辉(Yuan-hui Li)
A Study for Price-Based Unit Commitment with Carbon
Link:
http://goo.gl/LXV3PY
Abstract:
In this thesis, the Hybrid Genetic Algorithm-Ant Colony Optimization (GACO)
approach is presented to solve the unit commitment problem (UC),
and comparison with the results obtained using literature methods.
Then this thesis applied the ability of the Genetic Algorithm (GA) operated
after Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) can promote the ACO efficiency.
The objective of GA is to improve the searching quality of ants by optimizing
themselves to generate a better result,
because the ants produced randomly by pheromone process are not necessary
better.
This method can not only enhance the neighborhood search, but can also search
the optimum solution quickly to advance convergence.
The other objective of this thesis is to investigate an influence of emission
constraints on generation scheduling.
The motivation for this objective comes from the efforts to reduce negative
trends in a climate change.
In this market structure, the independent power producers have to deal with
several complex issues arising from uncertainties in spot market prices,
and technical constraints which need to be considered while scheduling
generation and trading for the next day.
In addition to finding dispatch and unit commitment decisions while
maximizing its profit,
their scheduling models should include trading decisions like spot-market buy
and sell.
The model proposed in this thesis build on the combined carbon finance and
spot market formulation,
and help generators in deciding on when these commitments could be beneficial.
2.Author: Ting-Chia Ou
A Study for Price-Based Unit Commitment with Carbon Trading by DI&C simulation
Link:
http://goo.gl/NCcszw
Abstract:
In this paper, the Hybrid Genetic Algorithm-Ant Colony Optimization (GACO)
approach is presented to solve the unit commitment problem,
and comparison with the results obtained using literature methods by
nuclear-grade Digital Instrumentation and Control (DI&C) simulation.
Then this paper applied the ability of the Genetic Algorithm (GA) operated
after Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) can promote the ACO efficiency.
The objective of GA is to improve the searching quality of ants by optimizing
themselves to generate a better result,
because the ants produced randomly by pheromone process are not necessary
better.
This method can not only enhance the neighborhood search, but can also search
the optimum solution quickly to advance convergence.
The other objective of this paper is to investigate an influence of emission
constraints on generation scheduling.
The motivation for this objective comes from the efforts to reduce negative
trends in a climate change.
In this market structure, the nuclear power plants (NPPs) and independent
power producers (IPPs) have to deal with several complex issues arising from
uncertainties in spot market prices,
and technical constraints which need to be considered while scheduling
generation and trading for the next day.
In addition to finding dispatch and unit commitment decisions while
maximizing its profit,
their scheduling models should include trading decisions like spot-market buy
and sell.
The model proposed in this paper build on the combined carbon finance and
spot market formulation,
and help generators in deciding on when these commitments could be beneficial.
引述IEEE的规定
http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/plagiarism.html
IEEE defines plagiarism as the reuse of someone else's prior processes,
results, or words without explicitly acknowledging the original author and
source.
It is important for all IEEE authors to recognize that plagiarism in any form,
at any level, is unacceptable and is considered a serious breach of
professional conduct, with potentially severe ethical and legal consequences.
IEEE IPR Specialist 回复
We are unable to download the following paper:
Author : Yuan-hui Li
A Study for Price-Based Unit Commitment with Carbon
http://etd.lib.nsysu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search-c/view_etd?URN=etd-0701109-225434
Could you please send us a copy?
Best regards
Tony
作者: Shilia (us, together)   2015-11-21 17:05:00
谢谢回复。在看到 "Will it help if Journal ask peopleto submit the "un-cut" film? From this example,requiring original film (which already modified by cutand paste) does not really prevent someone do thiskind of things." 的 Pubpeer 回复时,大概就心里有数真的话都 CCC 在讲,说要跑去再对着 editor 气呼呼骂说你是眼睛比我更大颗吗好像也不太对,因为应该是要去骂 CCC 那个超扯的修图唬烂女王才对。但是台大这案子跟文中的案例不同的地方在于郭明良有同意提供所有被质疑的论文疑点的原始档所以 CCC 就算很聪明地都是自己跟期刊编辑偷偷沟通,调查此案的特别委员会同样有权力要求 CCC 交出所有跟期刊编辑沟通同意让她 "勘误" 的信件往来纪录,如同文中的案例。因为要让其他期刊编辑们知道和讨论以后到底要如何对付这种做假手法粗糙低劣廉价到已经是现代一般研究人员难以置信的地步、但这些人在台湾生医学术界却都被视为是研究能量极高的明日之星,怎么想都很难跟外国人解释这种他们以为要是穷疯了的实验室才可能发生的造假谬误在台湾居然是拿到非常大笔经费的实验室"们"惯用的手法。请认真注意我说的话,国外期刊编辑或许这一回无可奈何只能接受 CCC 鬼扯,但是绝不代表他们都没发现到 Pubpeer 上现在越来越多的关于郭明良研究团队的文章都有同样的疑点,而且已经逐渐往人在美国不在
作者: moondark92 (明星黯月)   2015-11-21 17:24:00
注意到还是得装傻阿,否则就是承认期刊审查过程品质低
作者: Shilia (us, together)   2015-11-21 17:24:00
台湾的洪明奇院士那儿烧过去了。台大这回成立的特别委员会
作者: moondark92 (明星黯月)   2015-11-21 17:25:00
劣,就像小学有种题目叫做改错字,然后从reviewer到编辑竟然都没看出这种低劣粗糙的修图手法...
作者: Shilia (us, together)   2015-11-21 17:27:00
里头号称包含三位中研院院士在内,这回的调查结果是连美国都在等著看(就讲了再放任CCC到处乱讲话绝对雪上加霜),因
作者: moondark92 (明星黯月)   2015-11-21 17:28:00
就像选举多数第一任做不好还是能选上第二任,选民不愿
作者: Shilia (us, together)   2015-11-21 17:29:00
为台湾在国际生医学术圈上的 "信任" 已经被 CCC 那一团实
作者: moondark92 (明星黯月)   2015-11-21 17:29:00
意承认自己所选非人...编辑当然倾向选择相信只是误置
作者: Shilia (us, together)   2015-11-21 17:30:00
在有够夸张的家伙把 quota 全都消耗殆尽了!@#$%
作者: moondark92 (明星黯月)   2015-11-21 17:32:00
可以自己办一个期刊,叫做"生医抓漏",供各国做伦理教材
作者: darksaber   2015-11-21 20:48:00
几年前一个案例,现任学校:该案件为当事人在前任职学校发生,敝校不做处理
作者: saltlake (SaltLake)   2015-11-21 23:52:00
楼上 趁这波热潮可以再提起
作者: st12231 (Russel)   2015-11-22 01:01:00
除了论文问题,一堆万年助理教授没被fire的问题,科技部还有校方有没有想过要处理?
作者: alaric (宅化资料整理员)   2015-11-22 04:55:00
万年助理教授肯定不需要为论文作假.
作者: moonchaser (Moonchaser)   2015-11-22 05:14:00
一堆废物教授不敢检讨自己
楼主: ACE520 (ASE)   2015-11-22 08:00:00
一份结果可以拿来当硕士论文,博士投稿期刊,教授申请科技部计画结案报告,堪称物尽其用的典范
作者: hder (der)   2016-11-22 09:04:00
不是应该禁止挂名的陋习吗

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com