楼主:
wts4832 (住在海边的地瓜)
2015-09-14 19:42:55这应该是第一篇(?)专业研究八卦版带风向的文章
9/10才刚刊出 作者是来自 中研院统计科学研究所 的团队
Research Article
Analysing the Unequal Effects of Positive and Negative Information on the
Behaviour of Users of a Taiwanese On-Line Bulletin Board
原文连结:
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0137842
摘要落落长 直接贴结论
Conclusions
Using the PTT gossiping data, we have found some interesting findings for the
effect of social influence on users’ decisions on showing approval or
disapproval towards posted messages. We see that as long as decisions are
made in a sequence and observable, individuals tend to use this information
to help them make their choices.
作者研究了PTT八卦版的data后,发现了风向的重要性。
一篇文章出来后,乡民们会先看看其他人是推或嘘,再来来决定自己的意见。
Our results suggest that such influence occurs at the local level, implying
on-line users tend to adopt such information to conform to the majority of the nearby individuals. Moreover,
when more local information is available, its impact also increases.
简单来说,就是大家会跟着风向走;风向越强越多人跟着风向走。
Interestingly, even in an anonymous environment where individuals are unknown
to each other, there is still a tendency for everyone to follow the present
popular trend. If previous information is not revealed to users such that
they have little idea on what others have been doing, then whether social
influence still plays a role in users’ behaviour in an on-line community
remains an elusive question and experiments need to be conducted to
investigate this issue.
有趣的是,就算是在匿名,不知道id背后是谁的情况之下也是这样。
Moreover, the global and local measures in our models assumed independent
effects and each comment has an equal weight. In reality, some users
may be perceived to be more important (or more prestigious) than others
in a community, and their comments may consequently influence others
more strongly.
研究假设每个id的意见的影响力是相同的,但事实上有些id的影响力特别大,
带风向的能力特强,就是领头羊这样。
All these can be interesting questions and give directions to future research
on this particular topic.
更多的研究还在进行中...
心得:
真的不简单 我看八卦版只能浪费生命而已 竟然有人可以发篇期刊
看来以后研究生在实验室看八卦板 有新的借口了
作者:
sad0soul (SodaFohn)
2015-09-14 19:45:00丞相 起风啦
作者:
why2kill (WhyDidn'tTheyAskEvans)
2015-09-14 19:45:00这样也可以混一篇期刊喔
作者:
a126sam01 (北川景子是我的老婆>///<)
2015-09-14 19:45:00专业给推XDDDDDDDDDD
作者:
xzcb2008 (éžå¸¸æ£®77牛)
2015-09-14 19:45:00..........推奇葩
作者:
moon963 (moon963)
2015-09-14 19:46:00XDDDD
作者: silentence (小飞号:号:) 2015-09-14 19:47:00
带风向
作者:
hugh509 ((0_ 0))
2015-09-14 19:48:00XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
作者:
lkzax (sariel)
2015-09-14 19:48:00现实的风向早就变了
作者:
drajan (EasoN)
2015-09-14 19:49:00用机器看新闻
早就有一堆研究生在看PTT做舆情分析的相关研究了好吗
作者: gtrangel 2015-09-14 19:52:00
不就是从众行为吗???
作者:
toolittle (littletoo)
2015-09-14 19:53:00好啦 推 好不好
Acknowledgments They would...special thank you tothe participants in the gossiping board. XDDDDd
作者: a7526746 (阿猫) 2015-09-14 20:00:00
可是现实的风向表示....
可是没有讨论到分身帐号的问题应该说不知道有没有讨论到
作者: taylorabc (泰勒大师) 2015-09-14 20:34:00
就无脑啊 说话还要先看别人说什么
作者: dragonet5 (难怪会有5566出现) 2015-09-14 20:39:00
reference:北连中胡
作者:
Bschord (bschord)
2015-09-14 21:15:00好前几年就有研究文章了,只是不知道重要性,独见性到哪里