※ 引述《nogood (nogood)》之铭言：
: 三立前进新台湾
: 周守训放大绝：柯P身为公立医院医生
: 为何可以收连家红酒？
: 难道这不应该调查吗？巴啦巴啦....
: 抓到了，柯P收礼！
: ※注:有电视或媒体有报导者，请勿使用爆卦! 违者视为新闻篇数 超贴新闻劣退
AMA code of medical ethics
10.017
Gift from Patients
Gifts that patients offer to physicians are often an expression of
appreciation and gratitude or a reflection of cultural tradition, and can
enhance the patient-physician relationship.
Some gifts signal psychological needs that require the physician’s
attention. Some patients may attempt to influence care or to secure
preferential treatment through the offering of gifts or cash. Acceptance of
such gifts is likely to damage the integrity of the patient-physician
relationship. Physicians should make clear that gifts given to secure
preferential treatment compromise their obligation to provide services in a
fair manner.
There are no definitive rules to determine when a physician should or should
not accept a gift. No fixed value determines the appropriateness or
inappropriateness of a gift from a patient; however, the gift’s value
relative to the patient’s or the physician’s means should not be
disproportionately or inappropriately large. One criterion is whether the
physician would be comfortable if acceptance of the gift were known to
colleagues or the public.
Physicians should be cautious if patients discuss gifts in the context of a
will. Such discussions must not influence the patient’s medical care.
If, after a patient’s death, a physician should learn that he or she has
been bequeathed a gift, the physician should consider declining the gift if
the physician believes that its acceptance would present a significant
hardship (financial or emotional) to the family.
The interaction of these various factors is complex and requires the
physician to consider them sensitively. (I, II)
Link:


第三段提到，医生是否该收受病人的礼物，没有一个明确的标准，也没有固定的数值
去定义恰当与不恰当，而礼物的价值取决于医生和病人，但不该不成比例的过大，有
一个标准是，医生能不能舒坦的向同事或公众表明他们收下了这个礼物
也就是说，收礼物和柯文哲的医疗行为(假设连营认为有)，有没有不成比例的过大?
而公评这个比例有没有过大一个蛮好用的指标就是，医生能不能舒坦的告诉大家他们
有收受这个礼物
看起来柯文哲是不介意人家知道他有收这个礼物
那就让民众公评，收这样一个礼品，算不算礼物价值与医疗行为不成比例
当然啦，这是美国的医学伦理标准
给各位参考

直接抓去关吧 不用选了

你拿美国的刀 来斩台湾的医生?

说真的，圣文的命只值几瓶红酒吗？

要关送礼的人吗!?

我们有我们的玩法

你钓出一堆黑名单，厉害

一家有钱人送个大礼感谢医生很正常

美国标准 台湾不适用 谢谢指教

快报警 有人用酒买票

要支持kp欢迎，但要把某国制度当圣旨那叫殖民地买办

可是 马自己的党主席都拿美国宪法来说了耶

这时候就要比例原则了 20万之于连根本比鲁肉饭还便宜...

之前有台湾旅美医师羡慕MG149制度时怎么就不用美国标准？

救了枪伤的送礼 然后再以连家的财产来说 我觉得还OK吧

一楼活在专制独裁的社会吗??

先关一楼.不用选人了.

闹大一点，拜托！让我看看连还能多下限！

一瓶20镁的红酒，可见连家小气惯了，后悔不送20万的吧?