Re: [情报] 月黑风高2023-24 Mac Allister

楼主: oriole5566 (黄鸟56)   2023-08-23 12:24:23
红军阿根廷中场小麦(Alexis Mac Allister)因在上周六对樱桃帮的比赛下半场侵犯B
ramall而被祭出红牌。
小麦原本将错过对油卡斯尔、维拉和狼队的比赛。但红军在周一对红牌提出上诉并成功翻
盘,这位阿根廷中场球员现在可以出场参加这三场比赛。
英格兰足球协会在一份声明中表示:“一个独立 independent Regulatory Commission
在提出误判的申诉后,取消了小麦的红牌与三场比赛禁赛处分。”
The red card shown to Liverpool’s Alexis Mac Allister against Bournemouth las
t Saturday has been rescinded, meaning he will no longer receive a three-match
ban.
The ?35m summer signing was sent off on his first league appearance at Anfield
by the referee Thomas Bramall for a 58th-minute foul on Ryan Christie. Althou
gh his boot was high when he made contact with the Bournemouth player, there a
ppeared to be little force in the challenge and there was surprise that the VA
R, Paul Tierney, did not ask Bramall to review the decision on the pitchside m
onitor.
Mac Allister was scheduled to miss games against Newcastle on Sunday and again
st Aston Villa and Wolves in September. But Liverpool appealed against the red
card on Monday and the Argentina midfielder is now available for all three ga
mes.
In a statement the Football Association said: “An independent Regulatory Comm
ission has removed Alexis Mac Allister’s three-match suspension following a c
laim of wrongful dismissal.”
Jurgen Klopp had said of the on-field decision: “After the game I saw it back
. I think if you have a list of points, what we need to give a red card, besid
es contact there’s nothing else, no other boxes ticked. It’s a decision we a
ll agree if he gives a yellow card VAR would not overturn it and if he gives a
red card VAR will not overturn it because contact means it’s not a clear and
obvious mistake.”
Liverpool responded to the FA decision by saying: “A club appeal against the
suspension has now been upheld by an independent regulatory commission, meanin
g Mac Allister is eligible for selection when the Reds travel to Newcastle Uni
ted on Sunday.”
来源: the guardian
https://pse.is/57zldn
作者: iamnotgm (伽藍之黑)   2023-08-23 12:40:00
上诉原来是会成功的?!
作者: sammyymmas (Sammytsao)   2023-08-23 12:49:00
新赛季裁判感觉很亢奋 各种奇妙执法
作者: YCLEE1114   2023-08-23 13:38:00
合理
作者: leeleeg (O.N.O.)   2023-08-23 14:47:00
裁判都嗑了什么
作者: c8227867 (Athena10)   2023-08-23 15:40:00
楼下本人
作者: GSHARP (Mr.Q)   2023-08-23 16:34:00
这还好吧 取消禁赛是可以预见的
作者: MacAllister (海鸥王子)   2023-08-23 19:03:00
感谢英足协不杀之恩QQ (咦)
作者: ff760725 (㊣矮㊣肥㊣丑㊣穷㊣宅)   2023-08-23 20:57:00
毕竟亮鞋钉踩腿,主裁这样判也没法说啥,由于不是明显的误判,VAR也无法介入,但确实不必禁三场
作者: evol6381 (阿伊喜得路)   2023-08-24 06:42:00
XDD
作者: nuturewind (自然风)   2023-08-24 08:00:00
啊不就还好赢了,如果输樱桃现在补偿也不能改变结果
作者: sam9595 (帕帕)   2023-08-24 14:07:00
好奇VAR启动的标准是什么 应该不是明显误判才能介入吧很多时候不确定的时候不就是VAR启动的时机吗
作者: fukunmin (KUMI)   2023-08-24 16:52:00
不,只要是直接红牌(非两黄),VAR就可以介入;所以比赛当时VAR是同意这是红牌。只是禁赛场次数有上诉成功误不误判不是VAR的介入条件,而是看时机:1.入球时(有无越位/手球/乌龙球)2.判罚12码时 3.发生红牌时。除此之外VAR都是"不能"介入的
作者: GSHARP (Mr.Q)   2023-08-24 18:00:00
上诉成功不代表误判,大家觉得这个犯规没那么严重

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com