: 4.
: 此次联合国结论摘要 http://goo.gl/UlxUOL
: 小弟英文实力没那么好 时间也没那样多
: 上面的心得是随便乱看半个小时得出的
: 但就算英文再好的人 可能也要花好几个小时的时间阅读
: 里面有些海洋法的专业部分 恐怕会有看没有懂的
: 欢迎更厉害的人如hgt大 ZM大提出更深入的看法 或者是打脸
别搞得那么复杂
2012年通过的决议有7块相关海域
跟冲之鸟有关的只有 九州─帕劳海岭南部区块
The Southern Kyushu-Palau Ridge Region 简称 KPR
http://i.imgur.com/LGSCnN1.jpg 就是下方被画成红色的区域
The Southern Kyushu-Palau Ridge Region (KPR)
15 Addressing the Southern Kyushu-Palau Ridge Region (KPR) the Commission took
note that, in accordance with the decision of the Commission taken at its
twentyfourth-session, the Subcommission prepared the recommendations on all
parts of the submission. The Commission also recalled that, according to the
same decision, the Commission shall not take action on certain parts of these
recommendations until the Commission decides to do so.
16 The Commission took note of all the communications made by States in
relation to the submission described in paragraph 6, including the following
recent communications concerning Oki-no-Tori Shima Island received by the
Commission: note verbale CML/25/2012, dated 5 April 2012, from the Permanent
Mission of the People’s Republic of China addressed to the Secretary-General
of the United Nations; note verbale MUN/174/12, dated 5 April 2012, from the
Permanent Mission of the Republic of Korea addressed to the Secretary-General
of the United Nations; and note verbale PM/12/078, dated 9 April 2012, from the
Permanent Mission of Japan addressed to the Secretariat of the United Nations
and the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf.
17 In its note verbale CML/25/2012, dated 5 April 2012, the People’s Republic
of China states inter alia , that “ Such disagreement is, in essence, a
dispute of whether or not the rock of Oki-no Tori shall have exclusive
economic zone or continental shelf, and a dispute of whether relevant
maritime space is under national jurisdiction or acommon space of the
international community”.
18 In its note verbale MUN/174/12 dated, 5 April 2012, the Republic of Korea
states inter alia, that “it considers that there exists a dispute concerning
Oki-no-Tori Shima’s legal status.”
19 In its note verbale PM/12/078, dated 9 April 2012, Japan states inter alia
“Japan considers the argument by the People’s Republic of China and the
Republic of Korea insisting that the Commission should not make recommendations
on the regions relating to Oki-no-Tori Shima Island has no legal basis in any
of the relevant legal documents: the Convention, the Annexes to it, or the
Rules of Procedure of the Commission”.
20 The Commission considered whether it shall take action on the part of the
recommendation prepared by the Subcommission in relation to the Southern
Kyushu-Palau Ridge Region (KPR) and decided not to do so. The Commission
considers that it will not be in a position to take action to make
recommendations on the Southern Kyushu-Palau Ridge Region (KPR) until such time
as the matters referred to in the notes verbales have been resolved.