※ 引述《novel5566 (小说五六)》之铭言：
: 推 a1234555: 我怎么看这篇文章说法是先动你的钱，然后再调解，调解不 01/21 09:03
: → a1234555: 成才是上法院 01/21 09:03
: 推 Vulpix: 从这篇文章看，问题是YT也并非让司法来处理侵权，认定侵权 01/21 09:21
: → Vulpix: 是由B来做的。我的话，希望YT能想到办法诉诸司法吧。 01/21 09:22
: → arrenwu: 我并不是很相信YT在这个检举机制上是完全放任且摆烂 01/21 09:31
我刚刚去看了一下 Youtube 官方在这方面的相关规矩
Submit a copyright takedown notice
http://bit.ly/2sFOYod
这个连结可以让版权方提出要求下架某个他们认定侵权的影片
内文也提到，你要把你的资讯写清楚，然后YT会去检视，然后再决定要不要采用
但同时也会要你在递交申请前考虑对方是不是符合 "fair use"
这部分YT有一个关于fair use 的详细说明。
http://bit.ly/2W9cpUq
里面有提到YT现行对创作者的保护
YouTube receives lots of takedown requests under copyright law asking us to
remove videos that copyright owners say are infringing. Sometimes those
requests target videos that seem like clear examples of fair use.
Courts have held that rightsholders must consider fair use before they send a
copyright takedown notice, so in many cases (though it’s a very small
percentage of copyright takedowns overall), we ask rightsholders to confirm
they’ve done this analysis.
In some very special cases, we’ve asked the video’s creator to join a new
effort that protects some of the very best examples of “fair use” on
YouTube from copyright takedown requests. Through this initiative, YouTube
indemnifies creators whose fair use videos have been subject to takedown
notices for up to $1 million of legal costs in the event the takedown results
in a lawsuit for copyright infringement.
简单的说就是，这类侵权举报超级多，而其中也有不少case是YT觉得 "fair use"
但嘴巴讲没用，法院认证比较食在。如果有法院认证的案例，之后的类似案例出现，
YT就可以有多些理由打枪版权者或叫他们拿出更多分析
但这些案例，终究要靠打官司，YT也想到这点，
所以会提供最多到100万美元的诉讼补助。

要打官司要在谁家的法院?这种问题很多都跨国才麻烦吧