Please kindly provide your comments and suggestions.
1C后转换答叫
1C-
1D 4+H, 5+, may have 4+D if INV-
1H 4+S, 5+, may have 4+D if INV-
1S 4+D, 8+, 3-M if INV-
1N 4+D, 5-7, or 3334 5-10
1C-1D
1H 4+S unbal, 12-18
1S unbal, 15-16 -> NMF can be used here
1N semi-BAL 12-14 -> TWPCB
2C 6+C 12-14
2D C+D 17+ or 6+C 17-18 -> 2H F1, 2N min, other FG
2H 4H or 3H w/ short 12-15
2S C+S 19+
3C 6+C 19+
1C-1H
2D C+D 17+ or 6+C 17-18 -> 2S NF, 2N min, other FG
2H C+H 17+ -> 2N min
other same as above
1C-1S
1N semi-BAL 12-14
2C 6+C 12-14
2D 4D or 3D w/ short 12-15
2H C+H 15+ or 6+C 15-16 -> 2N min, 2S ask, other NAT
2S C+S 15+ -> 2N min, other FG NAT
3C 6+C 17+
1C-1N NAT
作者: kolay (土耳其的天空) 2013-05-11 19:02:00
我个人认为对1C答叫1N打5~7相当不合适,我们打转换答叫的目的不是要让好牌的人当庄?可以直接设定1S是没有高花的牌,1N可以设定是适合当庄的牌
作者: curiousbaby 2013-05-12 10:49:00
如果要做大幅度 (制度架构) 的改变, 建议也提供架构设计的概念、逻辑、优缺点等, 这样才能让人理解而不沦为死背吧 :)