※ 引述《polanco (polanco)》之铭言：
: 嘘 HsiangFly: 为何媒体都要刻意炒作法官是最纯的？ 当初不抓现在才 10/08 12:56
: → HsiangFly: 来拿清朝的剑展明朝的官 10/08 12:56
: 推 Coffeewater: 官方不想统一标准 让球迷继续再吵100年吧 10/08 13:24
: → Coffeewater: 那个时代就是有在吃药 但没认真管啊 10/08 13:25
现在有种说法好像是认为当时禁药泛滥都是联盟官方的错
都是联盟官方不制定规则放任球员打药 才导致禁药年代的产生
但这种说法其实完全忽略了球员方在制定药检规则上的脚色
首先 在美国工会法 规定是公司方不能单方面制定药检规则
必须要和工会谈判达成协议后才能实施药检 (Johnson-Bateman Co. (NLRB 1989))
然而当时联盟和球员对药检的态度又是如何呢? 参考2002年的这篇文献回顾 (pg. 443)
https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1112&context=jbl
After the Pittsburgh Drug Trials concluded, Ueberroth made a push for voluntary
drug-testing of all MLB players. The MLBPA rejected the plan in 1985, objecting
to it because they believed drug-testing intrinsically presumed guilt on the
part of the players. ...
...
After experiments with such initiatives as sanctioning for drug use, a joint
management-players' association drug program, and unilateral League management
proposals, currently no systematic testing program or disciplinary regime in
baseball has been agreed upon through the vehicle of collective bargaining. T
hroughout this process, player objections to mandatory drug-testing have
included the notion that testing is an invasion of privacy, an insult to player
integrity, and an ineffective deterrent of drug use (especially considering
there was no scientific data demonstrating widespread drug use among the
League's players).
从上回顾可知 早在1985年联盟就希望推动药检程序 但球员工会方持续反对
理由包括: 对球员有罪推定 侵犯隐私 污辱球员道德 缺少阻吓力
以至于到2002年联盟都无法订定可实施的药检规则
可以说禁药年代的发生 有一大部分的原因就是球员自己兼裁判
一直以来阻止药检的实施 才让工会成员能在这段时间内打药打爽爽
然后等现在禁药事件爆发后
却又要球迷不要用有色眼光看待当时打药的球员
恩...这是不是有点太过自助餐了阿