https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FP6I_wHXoAA_XI9.jpg
https://reurl.cc/nEkgpD
I don't understand why this is such an argument to be honest. I really don't.
It's not that close. You look at the three leading candidates... they start
talking about team victories. Jokic has been on the floor for more wins than
either one of those two guys.
我不太懂为什么还有那么多争论的空间老实说。我真的不理解。
差距并不小。如果你去检视三位领跑的候选人...
他们开始从团队胜利讨论。Jokic在球场上比其他两位拿下了更多胜场。
Jokic has played in 45 wins, Embiid 44, Giannis 43.
（截至4/8）
If you look statistically, he leads them across the board, all the analytical
categories he's No. 1. Including defensive box score plus-minus and defensive
win shares. He's ahead of both of those guys... then he's ahead of them in
rebounds, assists, steals, EFG%, TS%... I just don't really know how you can
make a good objective case for one of the other two guys.
而如果你从数据面上看，他几乎在所有的数据别都领衔第一。
甚至包括防守 box score 正负值，防守WS值。他领先其他两位候选人...
所以他的防守不是一个议题。
然后他还在篮板、助攻、抄截、EFG%、TS% 这些环节都领先......
其他竞争者赢过他的大概是火锅，还有得分。大概就这样。
Embiid 在三分命中率和罚球命中率更胜一筹，但其他所有数字都是 Jokic 占优。
我是真的不知道，要怎么替另外两位候选人做出类似这样较好的客观论述。
By Stan Van Gundy