Re: [问题] 今日洋基金莺战,Rivera胜投?

楼主: ypw (橙黄橘绿秋心不已)   2013-09-13 14:22:34
※ 引述《charliee (Double E)》之铭言:
: 以下摘录台湾棒球维基
: ======================
: 胜投投手的认定
: 该投手为胜利投手记录。但该后援投手投球时间短暂,且成效不佳,则不给予胜利
: 投手记录,而接替他出场之后援投手,为保持领先而有充分且优异表现者,应给予
: 胜利投手记录。
: 如果这规则跟现行MLB的规则没有出入的话
: 对于今天的胜投,我过去的认知是C项中的第二点
: 但记录组似乎引用的是第四点
: 不知道各位的意见如何
: 还请指教
http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/official_info/official_rules/official_scorer_10.jsp
英文版的规则就是上面的
其实大致上就是讲没成效的RP
(c) The official scorer shall not credit as the
winning pitcher a relief pitcher who is ineffective
in a brief appearance, when at least one succeeding
relief pitcher pitches effectively in helping his
team maintain its lead. In such a case, the official scorer
shall credit as the winning pitcher the succeeding
relief pitcher who was most effective,
in the judgment of the official scorer.
Rule 10.17(c) Comment: The official scorer generally should,
but is not required to, consider the appearance of a
relief pitcher to be ineffective and brief
if such relief pitcher pitches less than one inning
and allows two or more earned runs to score
(even if such runs are charged to a previous pitcher).
Rule 10.17(b) Comment provides guidance on choosing the
winning pitcher from among several succeeding relief pitchers.
这边的注释是讲所谓没有成效的RP:
(不过也有说这是参考条件不是必要条件)
在小于1局的投球下 责失两分以上(前任投手留下的也算)
比较神奇的是 这次Rob完成了一局还是被引用这条了
以前几乎没看过投满一局的还被这条拔掉胜投
作者: su43123 (无与伦比美丽的妳)   2013-09-13 14:29:00
因为从领先到被追平分所以胜投被拔?可是9上应该还是算Rob
楼主: ypw (橙黄橘绿秋心不已)   2013-09-13 14:34:00
呵 这条算是自由心证的条款吧 注释也说定义并非必要
楼主: ypw (橙黄橘绿秋心不已)   2013-09-13 14:36:00
官网也确认了 http://ppt.cc/CQjROfficial scorer gives Mo win, not save
作者: epw (Epw)   2013-09-13 20:36:00
!!!! 你好,我是epw XD.....

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com