Re: [问卦] 跳电不等于缺电?

楼主: SoSo5566 (↖☆煞气a飕飕★↘)   2024-01-15 02:26:36
※ 引述《Thompson13 (汤普森)》之铭言:
: 刚好跟朋友讨论到台湾电力问题
: 因为台电要买绿电要花更多的钱
: 我就说为什么不发展核能就好?
: 就传一堆资料给我看了
: 还说苹果真的会要求台积全部100%用绿电?
: 以下截图
: http://i.imgur.com/gpIXY0Z.jpg
: http://i.imgur.com/BHBLbK3.jpg
: 到底台湾缺不缺阿?
不好意思 打扰各位,经由各位的解释,
很明确是 Apple 要求供应链可以达成或配合RE100,
而至于核能,欧盟正式纳入为绿色能源之一,的确是需要严格的规范中实现,
现行在台湾定义的绿能,的确不包含核能,
然后回到Apple 能不能接受核电的议题,
从2023年 Apple Report 报告中,第113页的第4点,
有叙述再生能源议题,而最后也有说明能接受核能与水力发电产生的能源,
小弟不才英文不好,若我有叙述错误地方,再麻烦各位修正,谢谢。
原文:
Renewable electricity refers to fossil fuel–free sources of energy, like
wind, solar, and low-impact hydroelectricity projects. Clean electricity
refers to both renewable electricity as well as other projects that
Apple considers “low carbon” but not “renewable,” like nuclear and
large-impact hydroelectricity projects, which may be included as a
result of low-carbon electricity provided by the grid.
网址:
https://www.apple.com/environment/pdf/Apple_Environmental_Progress_Report_2023
.pdf

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com