※ [本文转录自 VAPE 看板 #1PhheSXQ ]
作者: tobetwob () 看板: VAPE
标题: [情报] 最近媒体电子烟打很凶 平衡报导一下
时间: Tue Sep 5 22:52:07 2017
个人觉得WHO FCTC公布的报告其实写的蛮中肯的，为什么到了反菸团体的手上，
解读可以偏差到如此程度，台湾电子烟产业需要平衡报导的声音！
疑问：董氏基金会为何没将 2016 FCTC 世界卫生组织 烟草控制框架公约报告放在官网上。
ABILITY OF ENDS/ENNDS TO AID SMOKERS TO QUIT SMOKING ：
16. The scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness of ENDS/ENNDS as a
smoking cessation aid is scant and of low certainty, making it difficult
to draw credible inferences. A 2014 review59 based on two randomized clinical trials (RCTs)
concluded that although the analyzed ENDS had a similar, although low, efficacy for quitting smoking,
the overall quality of the evidence was low60. The WHO-commissioned review reached similar conclusions
about the RCTs’ quality of evidence and efficacy.
17. Longitudinal studies are more abundant and better reflect “real world” conditions of use than RCTs,
but present more methodological concerns. Two reviews of these studies suggest that the use of ENDS may reduce the chances of quitting smoking61,4 .
However, the evidence is of very low certainty. Although most longitudinal studies found no cessation benefit or a diminished cessation benefit associated with use of ENDS,
a few studies62,63 found that the use of third generation ENDS under specific conditions of frequency of use may have cessation benefits.
This needs to be further explored before reaching any final conclusions.
In summary, given the scarcity and low quality of scientific evidence, it cannot be determined whether ENDS may help most smokers to quit or prevent them from doing so.
英文原文连结：
http://www.who.int/fctc/cop/cop7/FCTC_COP_7_11_EN.pdf?ua=1&ua=1
中文简易报告连结：
http://www.who.int/fctc/mediacentre/media-briefings/m-b-ENDS-ENNDS-zh.pdf?ua=1
最后,今年（2017）这么多对于Vaping正面的文献报告，现在只能先撑著别被毁掉，
剩下就看2018年的 WHO FCTC会议怎么说电子烟了。
下台一鞠躬