我记得在导览时,解说人员的确有说到这画原本就分两派
一派主张是,另一派主张不是
但是因为作画的手法实在是太像达文西本人,年代又相符
所以当时代的确争论不休
他也说最新的鉴定方法又说出这应该不是达文西的亲手作画
但因为众专家还是研判作画的人一定是跟达文西有很深的渊源
（好像是得意大徒弟还是什么？小弟忘记了）
因此还是一幅极具重要性的宝物
也不影响它的价值
而且好像达文西本人对这画也非常满意的样子
所以拿来当展览主打应该也没不对
以上是在展览解说员说的凭印象打出
※ 引述《bezbol (o.o)》之铭言：
: 先前就有不少网友质疑展览的真实性，但其实只要用 Google Da Vinci Self Portrait
: 就会查到一个标题为 Lucan Portrait of Leonardo da Vinci 的维基连结：
: https://goo.gl/sgVreY
: 开头文章简述这幅画的来历，然后就是这段
: Alessandro Vezzosi, director of the Museo Ideale Leonardo da Vinci at Vinci said in 2011 that he had excluded the possibility that it was a self-portrait
: 位于意大利弗罗伦斯的达文西博物馆馆长 Alessandro Vezzosi
: 在2011年时就排除这真幅画是达文西亲笔自画相的可能性了。
: 无庸置疑的是，这幅画是极具争议的，但官网跟粉丝页都号称这是达文西的真迹
: 粉丝页截图：http://imgur.com/mmokeyH.jpg
: 官网截图：http://i.imgur.com/ZxgwvWY.png
: 官方还说这幅画是私人收藏，不公开展出，就算出国也看不到
: 但同样的画作在2013年在大陆山东展出
: http://goo.gl/wjHbA8
: 2012也在法国展出，这篇报导就客观许多，没有夸大的字眼说确定是真迹
: http://goo.gl/rdwKIc
: 美国联合通讯社 Associated Press的报导
: 大致上就是说专家们皆排除这幅画是出自达名西之笔
: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Px9jbyORrh8
: “Experts, however, stressed that the age of the wood didn't necessarily mean the portrait was painted at that time and that more tests had to be conducted.
: The name of the artist who painted the image was also still being investigated, but the experts did rule out that it was a Leonardo self-portrait.
: The director of the Ideal Museum of Leonardo da Vinci stressed that the experts were "in the middle of researching, discussing and comparing several hypotheses that, however, must have a just measure, an appropriate limit".
: Professor Alessandro Vezzosi added that he himself did not think it was a Leonardo portrait - although he would love it to be.”
: 在台湾展览时，官方却完全忽略了学术性质跟争议，宣称是价值70亿的达文西真迹
: 让有许多台湾人付了钱进展场以为看到了天才的稀世名作
: 但实际上只见到了一幅有争议的文艺复兴时期的艺术作品。